They can be perfect for each other —
and still never meet.
While also organizing the actual event.
Which one is actually the better campaign?
Same label. Completely different inventory.
The transaction happened.
The measurement often didn't.
Manual + high touch
Software + data
Midpoint of our modeled national college-event sponsorship opportunity.
MODELED ESTIMATEYear-1 GMV target is approximately 30% of the initial NCR SAM. All figures are our bottom-up modeled estimates, not published industry statistics.
Only when a deal closes.
No upfront fee for colleges. Offlay earns only when the marketplace creates a successful transaction.
We're not trying to have 10,000 colleges. We're trying to make Delhi-NCR the easiest place to discover and buy college sponsorships.
Target segments: IIT Delhi, DTU, NSUT, major DU colleges, IPU, strong private universities, and other commercially attractive NCR events.
Campus representatives surface events, dates, sponsorship heads, committees, inventory and prior sponsors — they don't close deals. The central Offlay team verifies, sells, and transacts.
FMCG · consumer tech · fintech · food & QSR · fashion · education · D2C · youth consumer brands.
"Would you like to sponsor our college fest?"
"What audience are you trying to reach?"
Network + transaction history + pricing data + brand preferences + event performance data + trust.
College events are our wedge. Not our end market.
The underlying infrastructure stays the same: audience + geography + budget + objective → matching → sponsorship inventory.
Plus future monetization: subscriptions, campaign management, analytics, execution. This shows the economic mechanism — not a promise.
Actual valuation depends on growth, retention, margins, marketplace liquidity, revenue quality and mix, market conditions, and comparables. This is scenario analysis only.
If the loop works → densify NCR → build software around the proven workflow → replicate.
College events are our wedge. The sponsorship market is the opportunity.